Re: More spfile goodness
- From: "Nuno Souto" <dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 00:55:00 +1000
Why complicate things indeed? If it had to be a binary file,
it could well have been the control file as you suggest.
All this spfile/pfile rigmarole is just an unnecessary
and unwarranted complication. But it's great to generate
revenue out of OCP training...
Cheers
Nuno Souto
in sunny Sydney, Australia
dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: "Powell, Mark D" <mark.powell@xxxxxxx>
To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 10:47 PM
Subject: RE: More spfile goodness
> I have no problem with the concept of an spfile to hold database
parameters,
> but I wonder why Oracle did not use the existing control file. After all
> where else does control information belong?
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
