Re: Maximum height of an Oracle B-tree index

Lex,

I've just written a new script to prove
the point.  It takes a couple of seconds
to run on 9.2 and bombs out with
    ORA-00600 [6051]
when you hit the blevel = 24 / height = 25

So whatever the reason, the documentation
is correct.

(The script doesn't fail on 10.1, because the
leaf-block split algorithm seems to have changed)

Regards

Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html

April 2004 Iceland  http://www.index.is/oracleday.php
June  2004      UK - Optimising Oracle Seminar


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lex de Haan" <lex.de.haan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 1:59 PM
Subject: RE: Maximum height of an Oracle B-tree index


: I should have looked in my own documentation, of course -- thanks for the
: correction Jonathan...
: kdxcolev is indeed part of each branch or leaf index block, and it is UB1.
I
: also found the same note, saying that the max value is 23, so we have max
24
: levels (0 thru 23) but unfortunately, I don't have an explanation why :-(
:


----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts: