RE: Materialized Views 9i vs 10g
- From: Chuck Boddy <Chuck.Boddy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Michael Dinh <mdinh@xxxxxxxxx>, oracle-l <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:13:07 -0700
Hi Michael,
Great....i will take a look at this..
Thanks,
Chuck
From: Michael Dinh [mailto:mdinh@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:29 AM
To: Chuck Boddy; oracle-l
Subject: RE: Materialized Views 9i vs 10g
You might want to take a look at the atomic refresh option. If I remember
correctly, the default value change in 10g.
exec dbms_mview.refresh('<mview_name>','C',atomic_refresh=>FALSE)
Also, take a look at Doc 365157.1
We had to specify atomic_refresh=>FALSE in the refresh.
Let me know if you have questions.
Michael Dinh : XIFIN : 858.436.2929
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY - This material is intended for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that
is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable laws.
BE FURTHER ADVISED THAT THIS EMAIL MAY CONTAIN PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION
(PHI). BY ACCEPTING THIS MESSAGE, YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THE FOREGOING, AND AGREE AS
FOLLOWS: YOU AGREE TO NOT DISCLOSE TO ANY THIRD PARTY ANY PHI CONTAINED HEREIN,
EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY PERMITTED AND ONLY TO THE EXTENT NECESSARY TO PERFORM YOUR
OBLIGATIONS RELATING TO THE RECEIPT OF THIS MESSAGE. If the reader of this
email (and attachments) is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender of the error and delete the
e-mail you received. Thank you.
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Chuck Boddy
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:48 AM
To: oracle-l
Subject: Materialized Views 9i vs 10g
Hi,
I am taking Materialized Views that were initially built on a 9i database and
rebuilding them on a 10g database - verbatim. I am noticing that the
performance is noticeably degraded. Checked out the Explain Plan on 9i vs 10g
for some the materialized views, and they would indicate that on 10g, the
materialized views should at least perform the same OR performance should be
approved. Any ideas would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Chuck
Other related posts: