Re: Materialize hint
- From: "jaromir nemec" <jaromir@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "oracle-l" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:36:28 +0100
Hi,
> In reverse order, the "with" clause names
> and defines a subquery before its use in
> a query - a bit like a macro in C.
I'd see very valuable a constellation with "*distributed* subquery
factoring". I found no restriction on this in documentation, but have no
luck using it (on 9.2.0.5)
SQL> with myrows as (select rownum i from dba_objects@win where rownum <
1000)
2 select a.*,b.* from myrows a,myrows b;
with myrows as (select rownum i from dba_objects@win where rownum < 1000)
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended
Is it a bug or a restriction?
Regards
Jaromir D.B. Nemec
http://www.db-nemec.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "oracle-l" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 6:41 PM
Subject: Re: Materialize hint
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Materialize hint
- From: Connor McDonald
- References:
- Materialize hint
- From: Mladen Gogala
- Re: Materialize hint
- From: Jonathan Lewis
Other related posts:
- » Materialize hint
- » Re: Materialize hint
- » RE: Materialize hint
- » RE: Materialize hint
- » Re: Materialize hint
- » Re: Materialize hint
- » Re: Materialize hint
- » Re: Materialize hint
- » Re: Materialize hint
- Re: Materialize hint
- From: Connor McDonald
- Materialize hint
- From: Mladen Gogala
- Re: Materialize hint
- From: Jonathan Lewis