Re: Logical Standby Questions

I figured out that I had to grant LOGSTDBY_ADMINISTRATOR to the schema
owner in the primary database.  I granted it only to the schema owner
in the logical standby.  I did the grant and was able to
re-instantiate my test table.

Regarding the other issues with failed transactions, I found document
#5256179 which seems to match our problem but I didn't see any
evidence that the customer got the problem resolved.  I'm suspecting
that the logical standby isn't handling row migration very well.  In
the failed update transactions, the rowids don't match between the
primary and the logical standby for the given row (tables have primary
keys).

Mark


On 7/15/06, Mark Strickland <strickland.mark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
10.1.0.3 RAC with Data Guard on Solaris 9.

Last week, we added columns to a couple of tables in Production and
set the column values to zero.  All applications had been shut down.
No other DML was possible.  When that DDL and DML reached the logical
standby it caused a major hairball in the standby.  I've opened an SR
of course and done my due diligence by searching Metalink and Google
and the docs.  Not coming up with any answers.  SQL Apply continued to
fail after encountering failed updates to one of the tables that got a
new column.  SQL Apply kept failing even if I restarted it with "skip
failed transaction".  Finally, last night, I set that table to be
skipped and restarted SQL Apply and after a few more hiccups with
other tables and a few more restarts, SQL Apply caught up with the
primary which was 400 logs ahead by end of day yesterday.  I now need
to re-instantiate the table that was skipped.  I'm testing the process
in a 10.1.0.5 test environment and, when I issue

   DBMS_LOGSTDBY.INSTANTIATE_TABLE,

I get

ORA-31631: privileges are requiried
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_LOGSTDBY", line 392
ORA-06512: at line 1

I traced the session and didn't find a clear explanation in the trace
file.  I did grant LOGSTDBY_ADMINISTRATOR to the schema owner and even
granted DBA and SYSDBA to the account.  Has anyone encountered a
problem with INSTANTIATE_TABLE?

Regards,
Mark Strickland
Next Online Technologies
Seattle, WA

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


Other related posts: