Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- From: "Mark Strickland" <strickland.mark@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:47:18 -0700
10.1.0.3 RAC on Solaris 9 w/ Physical and Logical Standby
Yep, SR is open.
Had another incident Friday night where a column was added to a
"large" table (not that large) in the primary database and then the
column was set to a value with a single update statement. As before,
the DDL got applied to the logical standby immediately but then SQL
Apply slowed to a crawl. I'm running a test in a test environment now
because I suspect that Oracle is taking that one update statement and
converting it into a separate update statement for each row and each
of those updates is doing a full table scan (yes, all the tables that
are being maintained by SQL Apply have primary/unique keys). I'll
know more soon after my testing is complete, but am I insane in
thinking that Oracle should just run the single update statement
against the entire table rather than converting that into single-row
updates? Or am misunderstanding how LogMiner creates Logical Change
Records? I'm still learning how to query the various views related to
logical standby so I didn't do a great job digging into what was
really happening Friday night.
Regards,
Mark Strickland
Next Online Technologies
Seattle, WA
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- From: Andrey Kriushin
- Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- From: Mark Brinsmead
Other related posts:
- » Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » RE: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » RE: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » RE: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » RE: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » RE: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » RE: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » RE: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » RE: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » RE: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » RE: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » RE: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » RE: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » RE: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- » Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- From: Andrey Kriushin
- Re: Logical Standby Issues (cont.)
- From: Mark Brinsmead