Re: Listener.log not been updated
- From: "Andrew Kerber" <andrew.kerber@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:36:16 -0500
Well, reaching maxfile size set in ulimit would still be an os limit would
it not? Albeit not a hard limit.
On 9/27/07, Nuno Souto <dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Kerber, Andrew W. wrote,on my timestamp of 26/09/2007 10:08 PM:
> > If its 32 bit linux, there is likely to be a 4g OS limit on file size.
> >
> >
>
>
> Not really anymore, it'd have to be a very old version of Linux.
> Most have been able to create much larger files since about
> the y2k.
>
> More likely maxfile size from ulimit.
>
> --
> Cheers
> Nuno Souto
> in sunny Sydney, Australia
> dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
--
Andrew W. Kerber
'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'
- References:
- RE: Listener.log not been updated
- From: Kerber, Andrew W.
- Re: Listener.log not been updated
- From: Nuno Souto
Other related posts:
- » Listener.log not been updated
- » RE: Listener.log not been updated
- » RE: Listener.log not been updated
- » RE: Listener.log not been updated
- » Re: Listener.log not been updated
- » RE: Listener.log not been updated
- » RE: Listener.log not been updated
- » Re: Listener.log not been updated
- » RE: Listener.log not been updated
- » Re: Listener.log not been updated
- » Re: Listener.log not been updated
- RE: Listener.log not been updated
- From: Kerber, Andrew W.
- Re: Listener.log not been updated
- From: Nuno Souto