I notice they are running the firebird rdbms and cold fusion - shame about the error handling... On 5/17/05, Gints Plivna <gints.plivna@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I suspect those database sizes are actually meant TB not GB, because > in article http://www.dmreview.com/article_sub.cfm?articleId=3D8182 you > can find volumes more likely to be correct. World's largest DB with 29 > GB even in year 2003 seems much too small to be believable. > > Gints > > On 5/17/05, ryan_gaffuri@xxxxxxxxxxx <ryan_gaffuri@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > has anyone updated this list? or a newer list? I know AOL has two 25 TB > d= > atawarehouses. I have heard about petabyte databases as well. > > just curious. > > -- > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > > > -- > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > -- Niall Litchfield Oracle DBA http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l