Re: Limitations of MSSQL Server Vs. Oracle OR simply otherwise li mitations in general - OT
- From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Mladen Gogala <gogala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:45:22 +0000
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 00:52:39 +0000, Mladen Gogala <gogala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Oracle doesn't have to do much with the price to restore the
> natural order of things. It will be enough to cut prices of Oracle SE
> on Win2003 to 10% above SQL Server and MS can forget it.
For dual proc machines Oracle SEOne and MSSQL are to all intents and
purposes identically priced - actually Oracle is probably cheaper as
you can buy upgrades as part of the support cost.
--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
