RE: Julian Dyke's RAC book
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:06:16 -0800
>>>
>>>
>>>I am curious : why do you want to install a product like
>>>OCFS2 if it is only for redo logs, while any NFS vers3 will
>>>do as best and is built in most Unixies/linux?
Bingo... then why ASM for that matter? Like this:
http://kevinclosson.wordpress.com/2006/10/19/oracle-espouses-tiered-stor
age-asm-who/
11g on NFS will be even better...
But a CFS that actually works is nothing to shake a stick
at.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- RE: Julian Dyke's RAC book
- From: Polarski, Bernard
Other related posts:
- » Julian Dyke's RAC book
- » Re: Julian Dyke's RAC book
- » Re: Julian Dyke's RAC book
- » RE: Julian Dyke's RAC book
- » RE: Julian Dyke's RAC book
- » Re: Julian Dyke's RAC book
- » RE: Julian Dyke's RAC book
- » RE: Julian Dyke's RAC book
- » RE: Julian Dyke's RAC book
- » RE: Julian Dyke's RAC book
- » RE: Julian Dyke's RAC book
- » RE: Julian Dyke's RAC book
- RE: Julian Dyke's RAC book
- From: Polarski, Bernard