Re: Is RAC really HA on Linux
- From: Paul Drake <bdbafh@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:49:31 -0400
Steve,
Those archivelog destinations are all mandatory, right?
Non-mandatory destinations shouldn't really be counted on and may do
more harm than good.
Paul
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:38:47 -0400, Stephen Evans <evans036@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> we are a hospital & somes apps are so mission critical that patient care
> is compromised for every minute of downtime we incur.
oh. that sounds like a serious requirement which would likely be able
to carry a budget to support it.
> we are extensively using data guard right now. we have also achieved zero
> data loss on the san (against a SINGLE point of failure) by using a
> combination of dataguard and triplexing our active redos on two stroage
> controllers (in different locations) and on local unix storage. We are
> almost certain that we will always be able to obtain at least one copy of
> the active redo if any part of the system goes belly-up (hence zero
> dataloss once applied to our physical standby).
>
--
To unsubscribe - mailto:oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx&subject=unsubscribe
To search the archives - //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
Other related posts:
