Re: Interesting problem
- From: Stephane Faroult <sfaroult@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: dnt9000@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 21:30:06 +0200
Dave,
Is 'I'd love to set 10046 but can't afford to do it for all processes
and cannot catch the culprit' a correct interpretation of what you say?
Unfortunately, you cannot catch the problem after it has occurred. It
really depends on how your query is called. If it is called only by some
sessions, and repeatedly, and if the table which is accessed is pretty
typical of the query (ie you don't find it in most queries) - I know,
quite a lot of conditions - perhaps you could check V$ACCESS and switch
trace on whenever you notice (polling every minute) somebody accesses
the table and pray for the problem to reproduce. Another solution,
possibly more focused but otherwise a similar idea, would be to get
SQL_ADDRESS and HASH_VALUE for the said statement in V$SQL , and check
for their popping up in V$SESSION. By the way, it might be interesting
to check how many copies of the text (how many children cursors) you
have in V$SQL. It may happen that the same query applies to similarly
named tables in distinct schemas and the high-water-mark of one of the
tables (for instance) is very high (V$ACCESS could also hint at this
type of case).
HTH
Stephane Faroult
David Turner wrote:
>We've been using set client info on many of our
>production systems for some time and this helps us
>create resource usage reports so we can identify
>owners of bottlenecks. However, we do have some older
>systems where this isn't implemented and the
>transactions are much shorted so it's very hard to
>identify why some of our sessions have longer response
>times.
>
>For instance I have a query that scans maybe 4 blocks
>and returns data instantly when I run it manually but
>throughout the day periodically it takes well over 10
>seconds, which isn't acceptable.
>
>I've set up a script that montors the db every minute
>but it just doesn't appear to be catching what is
>causing our normally fast running queries to
>periodically run long. If any of you have any
>suggestions on diagnosing this I'd appreciate it.
>
>The main areas I've focused on are
>
>A minute by minute report of v$session and v$process
>info
>
>Many of the standard performance tuning stats tracked
>via statspack
>
>Cronjobs
>
>Feed processes
>
>with no luck so far.
>
>Thx, Dave
>
>
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Interesting problem
- From: Vlado Barun
- References:
- Interesting problem
- From: David Turner
Other related posts:
- RE: Interesting problem
- From: Vlado Barun
- Interesting problem
- From: David Turner