RE: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem.
- From: "Dunbar, Norman" <norman.dunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Robert Freeman" <robertgfreeman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:47:53 -0000
Morning Robert,
>> ...
>> 1. Do the duplicate. It would fail as you describe.
>> 2. Start a manual recovery using the SQL*Plus recover
>> database until cancel command. You can use until time, etc.
>> 3. Manually extract archived redo logs from the source
>> system as required for the recovery on the duplicate.
It was going so well. The problem is a chunk of missing archived logs,
so I'm unable to apply them. :-(
>> 4. Once I'm at the point I want to open the database, I
>> would open the database using resetlogs.
Which is, unfortunately, the point I can't get to. System data file
needs additional recovery.
>> The problem often involved a case where the recovery
>> point-in-time was contained in an online redo log that was
>> not archived yet (the current online redo log). You can, of
>> course, use the V$ views (ie: V$RECOVER_FILE, V$DATAFILE,
>> etc...) to determine the state of the data files, and their
>> consistency.
All files are online at the same SCN, date & Time according to
v$datafile_header. All files are still in "RECOVERY" status according to
V$RECOVER_FILE.
I have the rman backup and the backup of all the archived logs from
before, through and just after the backup of the datafiles.
Well, I did have. I've blown them all away now and restarted the rman
backup. Better luck this time I hope!
Cheers,
Norman.
Norman Dunbar
Contract Oracle DBA
CIS Engineering Services
Internal : 7 28 2051
External : 0113 231 2051
Information in this message may be confidential and may be legally privileged.
If you have received this message by mistake, please notify the sender
immediately, delete it and do not copy it to anyone else. We have checked
this email and its attachments for viruses. But you should still check any
attachment before opening it. We may have to make this message and any reply to
it public if asked to under the Freedom of Information Act, Data Protection Act
or for litigation. Email messages and attachments sent to or from any
Environment Agency address may also be accessed by someone other than the
sender or recipient, for business purposes. If we have sent you information
and you wish to use it please read our terms and conditions which you can get
by calling us on 08708 506 506. Find out more about the Environment Agency at
www.environment-agency.gov.uk
Information in this message may be confidential and may be legally privileged.
If you have received this message by mistake, please notify the sender
immediately, delete it and do not copy it to anyone else.
We have checked this email and its attachments for viruses. But you should
still check any attachment before opening it.
We may have to make this message and any reply to it public if asked to under
the Freedom of Information Act, Data Protection Act or for litigation. Email
messages and attachments sent to or from any Environment Agency address may
also be accessed by someone other than the sender or recipient, for business
purposes.
If we have sent you information and you wish to use it please read our terms
and conditions which you can get by calling us on 08708 506 506. Find out more
about the Environment Agency at www.environment-agency.gov.uk
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
- » Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - Dunbar, Norman
- » Re: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - Niall Litchfield
- » RE: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - Dunbar, Norman
- » Re: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - Martin Bach
- » RE: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - Dunbar, Norman
- » RE: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - Taylor, Chris David
- » Re: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - Peter Hitchman
- » RE: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - norman . dunbar
- » Re: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - Peter Hitchman
- » RE: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - Dunbar, Norman
- » RE: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - Dunbar, Norman
- » RE: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - Taylor, Chris David
- » Re: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - Peter Hitchman
- » RE: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - Dunbar, Norman
- » RE: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - Dunbar, Norman
- » Re: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - Peter Hitchman
- » Re: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - Marcin Przepiorowski
- » Re: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - Robert Freeman
- » Re: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - Jared Still
- » Re: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - Harel Safra
- » RE: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - Dunbar, Norman
- » RE: Interesting RMAN duplicate problem. - Dunbar, Norman