One of the surprising (at least to me) results of these tests was that while a failure of interconnect NIC (not bonded) on either node of a 2-node RAC doesn't create much trouble, the switch failure triggered a FSFO (fast-start failover) to a target standby. Just like with a single interconnect NIC failure (on either node) the same voting node goes down with the similar messages... ospid 13081: network interface with IP address <ip_address> no longer running Message from syslogd@<node_name> <node_name> kernel: Kernel panic: ocfs2 is very sorry to be fencing this system by panicing ... yet in contrast to a single NIC failure, RAC (or is it OCFS2?) doesn't recover, failing over to a standby, instead of a master node. Was that to be expected for a 2-node RAC or is it a problem with our setup (e.g. FSFO-threshold)? Thanks, Boris Dali. --- Boris Dali <boris_dali@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks, Kevin. > > The issue discussed in this SuSE thread is > documented on Metalink in the note# 394408.1 ... __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l