I'd say: - the 2:1 Intel Westmere-EP:SPARC VII+ core ratio from this partner is in line with my thoughts (so yes - the Intel core is faster) - Intel is probably cheaper per core/socket, especially at the smaller end of systems - A 2 socket Westmere-EP or 4 or 8 socket Westmere-EX system is pretty powerful by most standards, considering an 4 x 10 core Westmere-EX is 4 rack units! - No clue on Oracle license costs...but you can research that :) On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Oracle Dba Wannabe <oracledbawannabe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I suppose I should have chosen my words more carefully - the reason I > actually asked this question is because a partner provided us with some > sizing result for an Oracle ebs deployment. There were 2 sizings one on Intel > the other on spare vii7+, apparently twice the number of sun sparc cores are > required compared to Intel - this was the basis for my question. I get what > you're saying that performance is just not about cpu power. But all things > equal (if that's possible), the Intel solution appears to also be a cheaper > option given the core factors are also the same? The confusing thing is this > sizing appears to simply say the Intel core is better than the sparc one? -- Regards, Greg Rahn http://structureddata.org -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l