Re: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- From: Tanel Põder <tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx>
- To: "ORACLE-L" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 22:14:32 -0600
However a direct path write useful more often then compressed tables.
It depends where you're standing - a DW DBA or someone having to deal with
lots of audit data stored over long period of time would rank table
compression quite high. OLTP DBAs don't have any value
Tanel.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- RE: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- From: Herring Dave - dherri
- Re: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- From: Jurijs Velikanovs
Other related posts:
- » Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- » RE: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- » Re: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- » Re: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- » Re: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- » Re: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- » RE: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- » RE: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- » Re: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- » RE: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- » Re: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- » Re: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- » Re: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- » Re: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- » Re: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- » Re: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- » RE: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- » Re: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- » Re: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- RE: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- From: Herring Dave - dherri
- Re: Index compression on Oracle 9.2
- From: Jurijs Velikanovs