RE: Hitachi 9000 (was RE: 2GB or not 2GB )

From: "Kevin Closson" <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "oracle-l" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:47:04 -0700

 >>>Can you elaborate on this or point me to a source? I am 
>>>working for a large company that uses Hitachi SANs and we 
>>>are getting HORRIBLE performance for a data warehouse (i.e. 
>>>15 minutes to scan a 100 MB table).

Ouch. There is something much more broken than the subtleties I'm
talking about. By my experience it is best to stripe volumes/filesystems
across LUNs that involve multiple controllers especially if using
OPEN-[39EL]

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Follow-Ups:

Re: Hitachi 9000 (was RE: 2GB or not 2GB )
From: Niall Litchfield

References:
- Hitachi 9000 (was RE: 2GB or not 2GB )
  - From: Keith Moore

RE: Hitachi 9000 (was RE: 2GB or not 2GB )

Other related posts: