RE: Heisenberg and measurement intrusion....
- From: "Bobak, Mark" <Mark.Bobak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "oracle-l" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 16:54:05 -0400
Hi Ted,
I see what the person is saying. Yes, there is a measurable effect on
performance, due to instrumentation. (This is really due to observer effect,
not the Uncertainty Principle.)
However, without instrumentation, you don't really have a system that can be
tuned or optimized. You NEED that data to understand the system and its
performance profile. Without it, you have no idea which way to turn when
performance becomes an issue. Therefore, system instrumentation is an integral
part of the system. It's not optional. So regardless of whether measurement
intrusion costs you 1% or 10% or whatever, in overall performance, it's a
necessary cost.
To borrow a thought from Tom Kyte: Overhead is something you can do without.
Instrumentation is NOT something you can do without. Therefore, there is no
overhead cost to instrumentation. It's not an overhead, it's a requirement.
Finally, I'd say to the person making the objection: "Ok, what if we eliminate
all instrumentation from the system, and discover that the system performs (for
example) 10% better. So what? Are we going to remove all instrumentation, in
order to save that 10%? Of course not, we NEED instrumentation so that we know
what to do when something goes wrong! And, if there is no circumstance where
the instrumentation can be removed, then why do we need a baseline without it?
What will that accomplish, other than demonstrating the performance improvement
of a system configuration that will never see the light of day?"
Just my two bits.....
-Mark
--
Mark J. Bobak
Senior Database Administrator, System & Product Technologies
ProQuest
789 E. Eisenhower, Parkway, P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346
+1.734.997.4059 or +1.800.521.0600 x 4059
mark.bobak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.proquest.com
www.csa.com
ProQuest...Start here.
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Ted Coyle
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 3:40 PM
To: 'oracle-l'
Subject: Heisenberg and measurement intrusion....
I'm on an Oracle performance project and a project participant made a
statement regarding measurement intrusion.
Is the statement below accurate?
"So the Heisenberg uncertainty principle mandates we run without monitoring
as a baseline."
I responded with a wikipedia link which I'll send later, but I'd like to get
opinions first. :)
Regards,
Ted
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- Heisenberg and measurement intrusion....
- From: Ted Coyle
Other related posts:
- » Heisenberg and measurement intrusion....
- » RE: Heisenberg and measurement intrusion....
- » RE: Heisenberg and measurement intrusion....
- » Re: Heisenberg and measurement intrusion....
- » Re: Heisenberg and measurement intrusion....
- » RE: Heisenberg and measurement intrusion....
- » Re: Heisenberg and measurement intrusion....
- » RE: Heisenberg and measurement intrusion....
- » RE: Heisenberg and measurement intrusion....
- Heisenberg and measurement intrusion....
- From: Ted Coyle