RE: HTML DB - here to stay?
- From: "Weiss, Rick" <rweiss@xxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:11:27 -0600
Oracle Names was removed because they discovered a new revenue stream in
dragging those of us who wanted that functionality into OID and the
wonderful Application Server world
Rick Weiss
Oracle Database Administrator
Montana Department of Labor & Industry
Centralized Services Division
Technical Services Bureau
1327 Lockey
P.O. Box 1728
Helena, Montana 59624-1728
(406) 444-9628
rweiss@xxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kirtikumar Deshpande
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 4:00 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: HTML DB - here to stay?
...and the other product that comes to my mind is Oracle Names. It had
its share of trouble in the early versions, but once it stabilized, it
was discontinued... We have
both: Oracle Names and Designer... very heavily used.. :(
- Kirti
--- ryan_gaffuri@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Oracle has a track record of saying this is the direction we are going
> and then changing their mind. If you go to the ODTUG listservs and ask
> about this they will point out their history with Oracle Designer.
> Oracle convinced alot of people to spend alot of time(years in many
> cases) to become very proficient with designer. Many people designed
> full development processes around it. Oracle has ceased adding new
> features to it. Doesn't even cover hash partitions. Its still a good
tool, but its clearly slowly fading away.
> Wasn't there some web based technology oracle was talking about in
> 2000-2001, that just dissappeared?
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
