Beware sequence number can be lost even with nocache. You cannot use them as a contiguous numbering system where missing numbers will cause questions. Best rule of thumb don't use them if someone will look at them. On 29 March 2012 13:27, Taylor, Chris David <ChrisDavid.Taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Also be advised that sequences can age out of the cache and lose your cached > values. The next time the sequence is called a new cache of numbers is > generated and the unused sequence values [before it was aged out] are 'lost'. > (I wanted to verify that info was correct before I posted so I double checked) > > > > Chris Taylor > > “Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of intelligent effort.” > -- John Ruskin (English Writer 1819-1900) > > Any views and/or opinions expressed herein are my own and do not necessarily > reflect the views of Ingram Industries, its affiliates, its subsidiaries or > its employees. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Ilmar Kerm > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:01 AM > To: Oracle-L Freelists > Subject: Re: HOW TO SET SEQUENCE VALUE > > Quite dangerous advice, I think... Cache is a very important part of sequence > performance (and maybe the default 20 is too low nowadays also). Using > NOCACHE should be a very rare occasion, when "losing" > sequence numbers on instance restarts is not allowed. > USER_SEQUENCES just reports what value is stored in data dictionary, but > database instance is giving out cached sequence numbers. So the difference is > normal. > > Ilmar > > -- > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > > -- Howard A. Latham -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l