RE: Grow existing DBFs or add more?
- From: "Rich Jesse" <rjoralist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Ted Coyle" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:43:07 -0500 (CDT)
Hey Ted,
I knew I hadn't stated that very well. I never thought that any single
extent would be striped among datafiles, since the definition of extent is
"contiguous blocks".
Since I'm newish to RMAN and am far from a storage expert, I was fishing for
something like "never expand old datafiles because...". Also, since I
arrived here one month prior to the final implementation phase of this ERP,
ASM was out of the question. :)
It seems like I was happily barking up a nonexistant tree. Hopefully there
was no one in the forest to hear it, or some other nonsensical metaphor...
Thanks, Ted!
Rich
> Extents can't span datafiles. Each extent will be used across datafiles in
> round robin fashion.
>
> Example: 1 tablespace, 2 files and one table with two extents. The first
> write is to extent one file one, the second write is to extent two file two,
> then back to one and so on. Possibility exists that the first file has more
> extents based on initial extent allocation, but I didn't test this out.
>
> This is light on the technical, but it might help.
>
> Personally, I'd use fewer, larger files, but that point is based on the
> arbitrary nature of the installation, meaning fewer larger files work in
> some cases, and not in others. I'd prefer to go ASM bigfile on everything
> and not worry about storage allocation, but no luck with that yet.
>
> -T
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- Grow existing DBFs or add more?
- From: Rich Jesse
- RE: Grow existing DBFs or add more?
- From: Ted Coyle
Other related posts:
- » Grow existing DBFs or add more?
- » RE: Grow existing DBFs or add more?
- » RE: Grow existing DBFs or add more?
- » RE: Grow existing DBFs or add more?
- » RE: Grow existing DBFs or add more?
- Grow existing DBFs or add more?
- From: Rich Jesse
- RE: Grow existing DBFs or add more?
- From: Ted Coyle