Re: Flashback database versus RMAN
- From: "David Lord" <dlordster@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: moabrivers@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:55:09 +0000
Brian,
I don't think the choice is either-or. You can't recover from a media
failure or a disaster using flashback database so it isn't a
replacement for RMAN.
Regards
David Lord
On 19/02/2008, Brian Lucas <moabrivers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Outside of reinstantiating a primary database after a failover in Data
> Guard, are there any compelling reasons to use Flashback database versus
> RMAN for a 10gr2 database that's only about 100GB in size? It definitely
> seems like RMAN still holds the advantage.
>
> I like flashback query and flashback table but I'm having a hard time
> swallowing the need for flashback database.
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
