Re: FAL_SERVER and FAL_CLIENT

FAL_CLIENT is no longer needed in 11g.

Leyi Kamus Zhang wrote:
> OK, till now, everyone tell me the correct one is the well known one
> (aka the 1st one I list).
> 
> But, how about the 3rd one I mentioned, even only set FAL_SERVER in
> standby site is enough, if consider about role switch, I would add
> FAL_SERVER=STANDBY in primary site.
> 
> How about the FAL_CLIENT? any usage?
> 
> --
> Kamus <kamusis@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Visit my blog for more : http://www.dbform.com
> Join ACOUG: http://www.acoug.org
> 
> 
> 
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


Other related posts: