Re: EnterpriseDB as an Oracle replacement
- From: Roby Sherman <rxsherm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: ben.poels@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 19:59:38 -0600
We evaluated it a few months ago and found that the compatibility was
not great in several areas. In the case of PL/SQL stored procedures,
for example, they lacked support even for the most basic things that
we were looking for, such as:
* They defaulted to INVOKERS rights (Oracle defaults to DEFINERS)
* They didn't support DEFINERS rights on packages or procedures
(functions, yes!?)
* They didn't throw any errors on any stored procedures that couldn't
compile when "migrated" to EnterpriseDB
* There's was no status indicator that tells you that the code is
even broken (short of trying to run it and finding out the hard way).
* They claimed to have some compatibility with Oracle packages, but
the only thing they supported was DBMS_OUTPUT
Obviously this isn't the full and comprehensive list and, perhaps,
you don't care about PL/SQL compatibility, but if you have other
areas you are concerned about, shoot me an e-mail and I'll try to
share what I can.
--Roby
On Sep 5, 2007, at 6:56 PM, Ben Poels wrote:
I know many people have mentioned in the past that they find
Postgres a
viable alternative to Oracle for many uses. Now there is
EnterpriseDb which
is based on Postgres but takes it one step further and claims it is
Oracle
compatible. It even has range partitioning w/o the extra $$$. They are
touting FTD, Vonage and Sony's gaming division as major users.
Is anyone using EnterpriseDB for there non-critical databases to
save money
on licensing? If you are, how accurate are the compatibility
claims? I know
it doesn't support XMLTYPE and private synonyms for instance.
Anyone done
any benchmarks?
Ben
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
/=======================================================================
| Roby Sherman ( r x s h e r m @ i n t e r e a l m . c o m )
| DBA, Architect, Computer Scientist, Pain in the keister
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
| http://www.robysherman.org
|=======================================================================
| A computer without a Microsoft operating system is like a dog
without bricks tied to it's head
\=======================================================================
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: EnterpriseDB as an Oracle replacement
- From: David Green
- References:
- EnterpriseDB as an Oracle replacement
- From: Ben Poels
Other related posts:
- » EnterpriseDB as an Oracle replacement
- » Re: EnterpriseDB as an Oracle replacement
- » Re: EnterpriseDB as an Oracle replacement
- » RE: EnterpriseDB as an Oracle replacement
compatible. It even has range partitioning w/o the extra $$$. They are touting FTD, Vonage and Sony's gaming division as major users.Is anyone using EnterpriseDB for there non-critical databases to save money on licensing? If you are, how accurate are the compatibility claims? I know it doesn't support XMLTYPE and private synonyms for instance. Anyone done
any benchmarks? Ben -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- RE: EnterpriseDB as an Oracle replacement
- From: David Green
- EnterpriseDB as an Oracle replacement
- From: Ben Poels