Re: Effect of number of extents on Oracle I/O performance
- From: Nuno Souto <dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:23:44 +1100
Mark W. Farnham wrote,on my timestamp of 14/03/2009 10:58 AM:
2) When the extent size is very small (smaller than a multiblock read) then in cases where a multiblock read is interrupted by the extent boundary every time, then many small extents can be noticed. (If the extents are even a reasonable size, then the collision interrupting a multiblock read quickly becomes an infrequent event in a full table scan and the overhead disappears in the noise.
Seen this in some of the tablespaces in our DW. Unexplained slowdowns of FTS. Since then I've changed them to UNIFORM with size 50M or 100M, depending on the tables kept there. No more problems.
-- Cheers Nuno Souto in sunny Sydney, Australia dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxx -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Effect of number of extents on Oracle I/O performance
- From: Joel Wittenmyer
- RE: Effect of number of extents on Oracle I/O performance
- From: Mark W. Farnham
- Effect of number of extents on Oracle I/O performance
Other related posts:
- » Effect of number of extents on Oracle I/O performance - Joel Wittenmyer
- » Re: Effect of number of extents on Oracle I/O performance - Niall Litchfield
- » RE: Effect of number of extents on Oracle I/O performance - Allen, Brandon
- » Re: Effect of number of extents on Oracle I/O performance - japplewhite
- » RE: Effect of number of extents on Oracle I/O performance - Mark W. Farnham
- » RE: Effect of number of extents on Oracle I/O performance - Amar Kumar Padhi
- » Re: Effect of number of extents on Oracle I/O performance - Nuno Souto
- » Re: Effect of number of extents on Oracle I/O performance - amonte
- » Re: Effect of number of extents on Oracle I/O performance - Joel Wittenmyer