Re: Does this happen to you at work?

From: Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
To: stephenbooth.uk@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 21:48:38 +0100

On 5/10/05, stephen booth <stephenbooth.uk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 5/10/05, david wendelken <davewendelken@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Short of national security concerns, why would you want the extra 
> overhea=
> d of two additional database instances instead of just using three schemas 
> =
> in one instance?
> 
> Various reasons. The main ones are around mobility and political 
> infightin=
> g.

As with all things, there is no hard and fast answer to that.

We have a number of apps with a small number of tables. 

These don't get their own instance.

A number of replicated tables from 3 different apps don't get their own 
instance.
( not a DW )

SAP get it's own instance for each database.

-- 
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Follow-Ups:

Re: Does this happen to you at work?
From: stephen booth

References:
- Re: Does this happen to you at work?
  - From: david wendelken
- Re: Does this happen to you at work?
  - From: stephen booth

Re: Does this happen to you at work?

Other related posts: