Re: Disk layout for two instance servers
- From: "Jared Still" <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: neiloverend@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 18:17:00 -0700
On 5/2/07, Neil Overend <neiloverend@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Our current production server (that I inherited) has a complex
arrangement of disks with oracle files separated out to different disk
arrays. And what we've ended up with is half the disks red hot and the
other half under used.
... which is a great arguement for SAME.
Eliminate the headaches and hassles of deciding which files
go where, and maximize throughput at the same time.
Unless you're tyring to out-benchmark someone else, I don't
see the point of getting that granular in trying to allocate storage.
I'm not a storage expert, but I do know folks that are storage experts.
They recommend it as well, and it works well for us.
--
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
- References:
- Re: Disk layout for two instance servers
- From: stv
- Re: Disk layout for two instance servers
- From: Neil Overend
Other related posts:
- » Disk layout for two instance servers
- » Re: Disk layout for two instance servers
- » Re: Disk layout for two instance servers
- » Re: Disk layout for two instance servers
Our current production server (that I inherited) has a complex arrangement of disks with oracle files separated out to different disk arrays. And what we've ended up with is half the disks red hot and the other half under used.
- Re: Disk layout for two instance servers
- From: stv
- Re: Disk layout for two instance servers
- From: Neil Overend