Re: Disk Async IO
- From: "LS Cheng" <exriscer@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bnsarma@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 09:16:07 +0200
Hi
I think if you have Veritas Quick I/O it would have similar performance as
RAW Device.
If you have OnlineJFS without the Quick I/O then your parameters is doing
nothing as other suggested. However with Online JFS you can use direct I/O
which has a decent performance, by default direct I/O is not enabled, you
have to modify the mount options.
Both Online JFS and Veritas Quick I/O are very expensive though....
Rgds
On 9/6/06, BN <bnsarma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Greetings,
I remember reading Oracle Metalink Notes saying that Disk Async IO is not
supported on HP-UX for Cooked Filesystems.
We have disk_async_io=true for our Database in HP-UX 11.11 , Oracle
8.1.7.4 and 10g Servers.
I would like to ensure that my understanding and setting is right.
Right now we are using 4 dbwr's. I appreciate your suggestions.
Our UNIX SA says " Cooked Filesystems have their own Asynchronous
Mechanisim that equally replaces Oracle Async IO"
What Am I missing here
Appreciate your suggestions.
--
Regards & Thanks
BN
- References:
- Disk Async IO
- From: BN
Other related posts:
- » Disk Async IO
- » RE: Disk Async IO
- » Re: Disk Async IO
- » Re: Disk Async IO
- » Re: Disk Async IO
- » Re: Disk Async IO
- » Re: Disk Async IO
Rgds
Greetings,
I remember reading Oracle Metalink Notes saying that Disk Async IO is not supported on HP-UX for Cooked Filesystems.
We have disk_async_io=true for our Database in HP-UX 11.11 , Oracle 8.1.7.4 and 10g Servers.
I would like to ensure that my understanding and setting is right.
Right now we are using 4 dbwr's. I appreciate your suggestions.
Our UNIX SA says " Cooked Filesystems have their own Asynchronous Mechanisim that equally replaces Oracle Async IO"
What Am I missing here
Appreciate your suggestions.
-- Regards & Thanks BN
- Disk Async IO
- From: BN