yes, the parameters are set correctly...the whole configuration has been working for a long time w/o problems...2 days ago is prim. server moved to new DC with changed net architecture...and since then we have problems...I was assuming that FW is a problem so the net guys opened all ports (at least I have been told so) for a short to test if it works now...no luck...the problem persist... On 10/30/07, Carel-Jan Engel <careljan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Did you set the FAL_SERVER / FAL_CLIENT parameters? > If so, does the FAL_CLIENT (as configured in the standby instance) point > to the Standby? (e.g. the same as the service mentioned in the > LOG_ARCHOVE_DEST_n parameter) > > Best regards, > > Carel-Jan Engel > > === > If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. (Derek Bok) > === > > On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 15:11 +0100, goran bogdanovic wrote: > > in my case the passwords in pwd files are the same...checked... > and in my case regular log shipping works, only gap resolving not...in fal > trace file is posted below message... > > On 10/30/07, *Roman Podshivalov* <roman.podshivalov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I had a problem once when I changed SYS password on production and didn't > ship remote password file to the contingency site. But in my case regular > log shipping didn't work either. > > > > I'm still wondering what mechanism oracle is using in 10G to _remotely_ > log in from production into contingency as SYS without knowing clear text > password. There is something fishy with remote password file.... > > > > --romas > > > On 10/30/07, *goran bogdanovic* <goran00@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi all, > > DataGuard conf. Oracle *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt > from "10.2.0.2" claiming to be <http://10.2.0.2/>MailScanner warning: > numerical links are often malicious: <http://10.2.0.2/>*10.2.0.2 on Linux > - primary and physical standby with real-time-apply. > On primary side I get the following error in fal trace file: > "FAL Redo Shipping Client Did Not Establish Network Login" > > I couldn't fine anything useful on metalink or internet. > If some of you have already experienced something similar and would like > to share her/his experience would be of great help. > > Regards, > goran > > > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by *MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>*, and is > believed to be clean. > > >