Re: Design Question
- From: Sandra Becker <sbecker6925@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: kennaim@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:42:32 -0600
I've been in your situation. The logic here is "let's put EVERYTHING
> into a single table, no lookups because joins are always bad". Then
> something changes and I have to have downtime to update the table with the
> changes. I'm preparing to do another one of these and it will take
> approximately 2 hours of downtime, if all goes well. This is our OLTP and
> it is rare that they actually retrieve these columns anyway so why use the
> extra storage (which is far from cheap in our case). I vote for lookup
> tables for columns like state, gender, codifiable columns rarely referenced,
> etc. That being said, we do have a couple of columns in one table that are
> codes that hit lookup tables that are referenced thousands of times a day
> and they want the actual value, not the code. You need to understand what
> the application is doing/new code will be doing before you can make an
> informed decision about which is the best way to go.
> --
> Sandy
> Transzap, Inc.
>
Other related posts:
