Re: Dataguard v Homeguard.

For starters:


      * Zero data loss capability because primary can ship online redo
        log to standby as it is written, synchronously if you like? 
      * How about maintenance of 'your scripts' when you leave for
        another job? Is it as well documented as the Data Guard Concepts
        and Administration manual? 
      * Are the script prepared for every and any catch regarding log
        gaps? 
      * Can you elaborate on 'more', regarding control? What are you
        missing in managed standby?

Don't get me wrong: I have customers in my 'support base' that use SE
with scripted standby too. But Data Guard defininitely offers some nice
extra's!

Best regards,

Carel-Jan Engel

===
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. (Derek Bok)
===
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 19:52 +0100, Howard Latham wrote:

> I've got two standby databases in 10g
> one is managed 
> the other runs with a few scripts 'What I wrote'
> I can't really see why I would want to use Managed
> since I have more control over it by just log shipping
> 
> Any views?
> 
> 
> -- 
> Howard A. Latham
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and 
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is 
> believed to be clean.

Other related posts: