Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- From: David Sharples <davidsharples@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Dimitre Radoulov <cichomitiko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 19:29:57 +0100
I think you are right, im not convicned it will work though - doesnt
seem right to me
On 6/1/05, Dimitre Radoulov <cichomitiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> do you really need DataGuard with
> this configuration?
>=20
> You just can stop the primary and start the other one ... or you need the
> secondary open in read only(and you could open it anyway without DataGuar=
d)?
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- From: Carel-Jan Engel
- References:
- Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- From: David Sharples
- Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- From: Dimitre Radoulov
Other related posts:
- » Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » RE: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- From: Carel-Jan Engel
- Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- From: David Sharples
- Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- From: Dimitre Radoulov