Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- From: David Sharples <davidsharples@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cjpengel.dbalert@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:16:38 +0100
excellent thanks. Will most likely get a chance to try this in the
next few days. Will post back with the results
On 5/31/05, Carel-Jan Engel <cjpengel.dbalert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It depends.
>=20
> If using ARCH as the means of transport, yes, you're probably right. I
> haven't tested it, nor time to do it the coming days.
>=20
> If using LGWR to get the redo sent to the standby (using standby redo log
> files), the logswitch will be performed locally on the standby. So, there
> is no incomplete archived redo logfile at the standby.
<snip>
>
> If you get a chance to do the test, I'd be glad if you can share
> the results. Meanwhile, it's on my 'wishlist' for future tests. Thank you
> for the question.
>
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- Dataguard / Archive Logs
- From: David Sharples
- Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- From: Carel-Jan Engel
Other related posts:
- » Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » RE: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- » Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- Dataguard / Archive Logs
- From: David Sharples
- Re: Dataguard / Archive Logs
- From: Carel-Jan Engel