Re: DataGuard
- From: Mladen Gogala <mgogala@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: cjpengel.dbalert@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 08:06:30 -0500
On 01/16/2007 02:42:58 AM, Carel-Jan Engel wrote:
> Mladen,
>
> If a network cannot keep up with the redo of one instance, how could RAC
> improve that?
>
Carel-Jan, I thought of RAC as the first level of failure protection. If RAC
fails,
there's still a standby database. That was what I found interesting in the idea
of the original poster.
--
Mladen Gogala
http://www.mladen-gogala.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- Re: DataGuard
- From: Mladen Gogala
- Re: DataGuard
- From: Carel-Jan Engel
Other related posts:
- » DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » Re: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » Re: DataGuard
- » Re: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » Re: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » Re: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » Re: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- » DataGuard
- » Re: DataGuard
- » Re: DataGuard
- » RE: DataGuard
- Re: DataGuard
- From: Mladen Gogala
- Re: DataGuard
- From: Carel-Jan Engel