Re: Data Guard question.
- From: Mark Bole <makbo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 12:47:46 -0700
Ron Rogers wrote:
> List,
> I have been looking into using Data Guard as a method of providing HA is =
> the company decides it is an option they want to invest in.
> The question that I have are.
> 1. Using a physical database as the Data Guard, does the second server =
> have to have the exact same physical equipment for the disks or does it =
> just have to be the same directory structure? [...]
Doesn't even require that, since a physical standby can be on the same
machine as the primary if desired.
Check the Data Guard manual for the section "Standby Database Directory
Structure Considerations" and the DB_FILE_NAME_CONVERT and
LOG_FILE_NAME_CONVERT parameters.
--
Mark Bole
http://www.bincomputing.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Data Guard question.
- From: Carel-Jan Engel
- References:
- Data Guard question.
- From: Ron Rogers
Other related posts:
- » Data Guard question
- » Re: Data Guard question
- » RE: Data Guard question
- » RE: Data Guard question
- » Re: Data Guard question
- » RE: Data Guard question
- » Data Guard question
- » Re: Data Guard question
- » Re: Data Guard question
- » RE: Data Guard question
- » Re: Data Guard question
- » Data Guard question.
- » Re: Data Guard question.
- » Re: Data Guard question.
- » Re: Data Guard question.
- » Re: Data Guard question.
- » Re: Data Guard question.
- » Re: Data Guard question.
- » Re: Data Guard question.
- » Data Guard question.
- » Re: Data Guard question.
- » Data Guard question - Bill Zakrzewski
- » Re: Data Guard question - Niall Litchfield
- » RE: Data Guard question - Crisler, Jon
- Re: Data Guard question.
- From: Carel-Jan Engel
- Data Guard question.
- From: Ron Rogers