Re: Data Guard Standby Database
- From: d cheng <dc4oracle@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: John Darrah <darrah.john@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
Thank you everyone for your responses! What is the difference between going
with a RAC standby versus a single instance standby?
- David
John Darrah <darrah.john@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The only limitation I know of is that you can't have RAC going to single
instance and then cascade from there to another standby. You can definitely
have a simple standby from RAC to single instance.
On 7/27/07, d cheng <dc4oracle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi Listers,
I am working with a 2-node RAC system and we are thinking about using Data
Guard's physical database feature for DR Do you know if we can use a single
instance physical Standby database versus having another 2-node RAC standby
system?
Thank you in advance for your help!
- David
---------------------------------
Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today!
---------------------------------
Luggage? GPS? Comic books?
Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Data Guard Standby Database
- From: David Sharples
- References:
- Re: Data Guard Standby Database
- From: John Darrah
Other related posts:
- » Data Guard Standby Database
- » Re: Data Guard Standby Database
- » Re: Data Guard Standby Database
- » Re: Data Guard Standby Database
- » Re: Data Guard Standby Database
- » Re: Data Guard Standby Database
- » Re: Data Guard Standby Database
- » Re: Data Guard Standby Database
- Re: Data Guard Standby Database
- From: David Sharples
- Re: Data Guard Standby Database
- From: John Darrah