Re: DST Apology
- From: "Jared Still" <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Allen, Brandon" <Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:29:34 -0800
On 2/20/07, Allen, Brandon <Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But while we're on the subject (again), let me emphasize for the 42nd time
that the "updated" utltzuv2.sql script as downloaded from Metalink is in
fact *not* complete/correct. I have been trying to get this point across
for weeks now (on this list, under the subject "ALERT - Potentially
Serious Problem with DST Patches for New Timezones"), but I'm not sure how
many people are listening. Metalink released two notes addressing this
problem on Feb 12th and I strongly recommend everyone read them: 414590.1 &
414826.1.
Thanks for the reminder Brandon.
This whole process is way too complicated.
--
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
- References:
- DST Apology
- From: Jared Still
- RE: DST Apology
- From: Allen, Brandon
Other related posts:
- » DST Apology
- » RE: DST Apology
- » Re: DST Apology
- » RE: DST Apology
- » Re: DST Apology
- » Re: DST Apology
- » RE: DST Apology
- » Re: DST Apology
But while we're on the subject (again), let me emphasize for the 42nd time that the "updated" utltzuv2.sql script as downloaded from Metalink is in fact *not* complete/correct. I have been trying to get this point across for weeks now (on this list, under the subject "ALERT - Potentially Serious Problem with DST Patches for New Timezones"), but I'm not sure how many people are listening. Metalink released two notes addressing this problem on Feb 12th and I strongly recommend everyone read them: 414590.1 & 414826.1.
- DST Apology
- From: Jared Still
- RE: DST Apology
- From: Allen, Brandon