Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- From: Tim Gorman <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 11:24:59 -0600
Juan Carlos,
This is from a SQL*Plus script that I use to audit DDL commands only. I
tend to enable DDL auditing in production databases, because you shouldn't
see DDL in production except during change-management windows (ideally).
Anything that violates that rule should be considered an anomaly worth
investigating.
This SQL*Plus script, named "audit_ddl.sql", is available online at
"http://www.EvDBT.com/tools.htm".
At the bottom of the script, you'll see the creation of a job in the
DBMS_JOB facility where audit-trail records older than 45 days are deleted.
Of course, that particular setting should be seasoned to taste, but I chose
45 days because it shows two complete month-ends at any one time. Other
places choose to wait longer (i.e. 180 days or so) to purge audit-trail
data, while some places don't purge at all. Implicitly, this job is
intended for the setting AUDIT_TRAIL=DB only.
Hope this helps...
-Tim
============== begin text of SQL*Plus script ================
whenever oserror exit failure
whenever sqlerror exit failure
column schema_user format a12
column what format a50
set pagesize 100 linesize 130 trimout on trimspool on
set echo on feedback on timing on
spool audit_ddl
connect / as sysdba
show user
show release
show parameter audit_trail
audit CLUSTER;
audit CONTEXT;
audit DATABASE LINK;
audit DIMENSION;
audit DIRECTORY;
audit INDEX;
audit PROCEDURE;
audit PROFILE;
audit PUBLIC DATABASE LINK;
audit PUBLIC SYNONYM;
audit ROLE;
audit ROLLBACK SEGMENT;
audit SEQUENCE;
REM audit SESSION; -- enable session auditing only if desired
audit SYNONYM;
audit SYSTEM AUDIT;
audit SYSTEM GRANT;
audit TABLE;
audit TABLESPACE;
audit TRIGGER;
audit TYPE;
audit USER;
audit VIEW;
audit ALTER SEQUENCE;
audit ALTER TABLE;
audit COMMENT TABLE;
audit GRANT DIRECTORY;
audit GRANT PROCEDURE;
audit GRANT SEQUENCE;
audit GRANT TABLE;
audit GRANT TYPE;
REM
REM Please set the number of days to retain audit-trail information
REM as desired. Currently, this script will submit a DBMS_JOB job
REM to purge data from the sys.aud$ table older than 45 days...
REM
REM Job is scheduled to run once per day...
REM
variable jobno number
exec dbms_job.submit(:jobno, 'begin delete from aud$ where timestamp# <
sysdate - 45; end;', sysdate+(1/1440), 'sysdate+1', TRUE)
select job,
schema_user,
what,
next_date,
next_sec,
broken,
failures
from user_jobs
where job = :jobno;
exit success
============== end text of SQL*Plus script ================
on 5/4/04 10:22 AM, Juan Cachito Reyes Pacheco at jreyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
> Sorry Jesse could you giveme the step by step guide
> to enable ddl auditing if possible, using oracle audit features please.
> I lost in some point when trying to use it.
>
>
> Juan Carlos Reyes Pacheco
> OCP
> Database 9.2 Standard Edition
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
> --
> Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
> FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- From: Teresa Redmond
- References:
- Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- From: Juan Cachito Reyes Pacheco
Other related posts:
- » DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » RE: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » RE: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » RE: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » RE: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » RE: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » RE: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » RE: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » RE: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- » Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- From: Teresa Redmond
- Re: DDL auditing - *Extremely* detailed
- From: Juan Cachito Reyes Pacheco