RE: Cost/Time Anomaly
- From: "Richard J. Goulet" <rgoulet@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "ORACLE-L" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:32:06 -0500
This stinks like a star schema of one sort or another, therefore is star_join enabled in this database? Dick Goulet, Senior Oracle DBA 45 Bartlett St Marlborough, Ma 01752, USA Tel.: 508.573.1978 |Fax: 508.229.2019 | Cell:508.742.5795 RGoulet@xxxxxxxxxx : POWERING TRANSFORMATION ________________________________ From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of blr_dba Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 2:03 PM To: 'ORACLE-L' Subject: Cost/Time Anomaly Hi Gurus, Am stuck in a tuning problem and need your expertise to get rid of the issue. I have 3 huge tables(~20M rows each) and many small look up tables joined in a query as follows... Assume: Big tables : BT1, BT2, BT3 Small tables: ST1, ST2, ST3, ST4, ST5, ST6 select * from BT1, BT2, BT3, ST1, ST2, ST3, ST4, ST5, ST6 where BT1.id=BT2.id(+) and BT1.id=BT3.id(+) and BT1.id=ST1.id(+) and BT1.id=ST2.id(+) and BT1.id=ST3.id(+) and BT1.id=ST4.id(+) and BT1.id=ST5.id(+) and BT1.id=ST6.id(+); The CBO is using hash joins and the cost is too high (400K) and we are having a lots of "direct path write waits". I tried to remove the outer joins for the small lookup tables by using sclar sub-queries. The cost reduced drastically (10K) but the overall execution time got increased. Badly need your expertise to get rid of this issue. Also would like to know even if the CBO cost is less in the second case, why the overall execution time is more. Is n't the cost inversly proportional to the time taken to execute the query?