RE: Cost of open_cursors parameter
- From: "Wolfson Larry - lwolfs" <lawrence.wolfson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <peter.schauss@xxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:09:38 -0500
Peter,
I heard from 9.2.0.6 on open_cursors was being replaced by
session_cached_cursors. Tom Kyte told me cost of SCC was pretty cheap.
Steve Adams has some scripts at ixora.au.com to tell you how
much you are using.
Larry
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schauss, Peter
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 1:19 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Cost of open_cursors parameter
What is the cost of increasing the open_cursors parameter? I assume
that, since the value applies to each session, there must be an increase
in the size of some in-memory data structure for the background process
associated with each session.
Thanks,
Peter Schauss
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
**************************************************************************
The information contained in this communication is confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please resend this
communication to the sender and delete the original message or any copy
of it from your computer system.
Thank You.
**************************************************************************
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
