RE: Confirmation of trace data
- From: J.Velikanovs@xxxxxxxx
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:02:14 +0300
Mark,
Original post had information that in this case there 200 simultaneous
sessions.
So this is not stange that each of Oracle thread have max 1/50 of CPU
resource (OS overhead not counted).
I don't any thing strange in this behavior.
It is as it intended to work, or I missed some thing?
Jurijs
+371 9268222 (+2 GMT)
============================================
Thank you for teaching me.
http://otn.oracle.com/ocm/jvelikanovs.html
On 03.08.2004 18:04:28 oracle-l-bounce wrote:
>Forgive my confusion. If the full CPU utilization is showing in task
>manager, can you not just pull up the tab showing processes, click on the
>cpu column, and get a list of processes ordered by CPU consumption rate?
My
>guess is that should show you what is consuming the time. From this same
tab
>you should be able to find the Oracle processes and verify how much CPU
they
>get per unit of real time. Not that this solves your problem, but I think
it
>would let you know what is burning the CPU and confirm that Oracle is
>getting only dribs and drabs of time. Then again, my level of confusion
on
>what is growing wrong on products from the referenced company is very
high
>and nearly continuous.
>
>--->>> probably trojan_remail_everyone.new_undetected_worm_of_the_day (I
>hope not.)
>
>mwf
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
