RE: Clusterware tests
- From: "Matthew Zito" <mzito@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <alever@xxxxxxxxx>, "melkin4u" <melkin4u@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:17:25 -0400
Am I mistaken, or isn't ASM a requirement for standard edition? Matt > -----Original Message----- > From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > So we choose to use Oracle Standard + Clusterware instead of Enterprise + > RAC and also a common and standardized (and possibly simple) set of > commands are required for managing clustered resources by the operators. > > I used OCFS instead of ASM because of PostgreSQL; of course I could use > ASM For Oracle ad OCFS for Postgres, but for standardization..... > -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Clusterware tests
- From: Andrew Kerber
- Re: Clusterware tests
- From: Niall Litchfield
- Re: Clusterware tests
- References:
- Re: Clusterware tests
- From: Alessandro Vercelli
- Re: Clusterware tests
Other related posts:
- » Clusterware tests - Alessandro Vercelli
- » Re: Clusterware tests - Michael Elkin
- » Re: Clusterware tests - Alessandro Vercelli
- » RE: Clusterware tests - Matthew Zito
- » Re: Clusterware tests - Andrew Kerber
- » Re: Clusterware tests - Niall Litchfield
- » Re: Clusterware tests - Alessandro Vercelli
- » Re: Clusterware tests - Alessandro Vercelli
- » Re: Clusterware tests - Thomas Roach
- » Re: Clusterware tests - Jared Still
- » Re: Clusterware tests - Alessandro Vercelli
- » RE: Clusterware tests - D'Hooge Freek
- » Re: Clusterware tests - Niall Litchfield
- » Re: Clusterware tests - Niall Litchfield