Re: Clarion CX500 or Sun StorEdge 6920 Storage solution
- From: Matthew Zito <mzito@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Jeff.Wiegand@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 23:45:34 -0400
I would go with the Clariion over the Sun box. While the Sun box has
the advantage of being able to virtualize other companies' storage,
it begs the question, "Why would you want to?". Also, Sun storage
has a tradition of being terrible, especially early revs, and this is
a rev 1 box at the moment. Beyond that, Sun's support for non-
Solaris OSes is usually less than ideal, while EMC specializes in that.
As far as the replication goes, data guard has the advantage that it
won't propagate corruption to the far side. Storage based
replication has the advantage that it can be synchronous even when
the database is down on the far side, with no host CPU involvement.
Pick your poison.....
Thanks,
Matt
On May 19, 2005, at 3:50 PM, Wiegand, Jeff wrote:
>
> Good day.
>
> We're looking to make a decision on a SAN storage solution shortly. I
> was wondering if anyone had any insights or preferences regarding
> these
> two products. We'll be using snapshot functionality to refresh our
> dev,
> qa, and stg environments. We're running with a high-available 3-
> node RAC
> with Data Guard solution on Windows, moving to Solaris this summer.
> Our
> standby is hosted at our facilities and production off-site, with a
> hosting provider.=20
>
> We're also considering the possibility of using SAN replication
> instead
> of Data Guard. Is one product glaringly better than the other?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jeff
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
