Re: Centralization of DB+OAS
- From: "Alfonso León" <aleon68@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:48:22 -0500
thanks david, it works, but is it the best cost scenario to expend buying
memory, network cards and procesors for a HP superdome instead that getting
linux boxes? I don't think that is normal to use this kind of
configuration?
Thanks
On 6/13/07, David Sharples <davidsharples@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
if the server has the capacity - no problems with is
they live in different oracle homes so dont intefere with each other, no
probs
On 13/06/07, Alfonso León <aleon68@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone:
>
> One of our clients got the brilliant Idea in order to "reduce the
> budget" to centralice the Database and the OAS in the same server. We are
> talking about a HP server with HPUX-11.23. with 12 CPU memory of 8GB
> and 2TB of DB. The server is using 50% CPU, 80%Memory and Disk response is
> acceptable. There are 3 OAS with 4GB and 2 CPU on linux and atend about
> 1.200 users of a banking application.
>
--
Alfonso Leon
- References:
- Centralization of DB+OAS
- From: Alfonso León
- Re: Centralization of DB+OAS
- From: David Sharples
Other related posts:
- » Centralization of DB+OAS
- » Re: Centralization of DB+OAS
- » Re: Centralization of DB+OAS
if the server has the capacity - no problems with is they live in different oracle homes so dont intefere with each other, no probs On 13/06/07, Alfonso León <aleon68@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello everyone: > > One of our clients got the brilliant Idea in order to "reduce the > budget" to centralice the Database and the OAS in the same server. We are > talking about a HP server with HPUX-11.23. with 12 CPU memory of 8GB > and 2TB of DB. The server is using 50% CPU, 80%Memory and Disk response is > acceptable. There are 3 OAS with 4GB and 2 CPU on linux and atend about > 1.200 users of a banking application. >
- Centralization of DB+OAS
- From: Alfonso León
- Re: Centralization of DB+OAS
- From: David Sharples