Re: Caution on LOG_PARALLELISM
- From: Mladen Gogala <mgogala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: k.sriramkumar@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:05:10 -0400
Sriram Kumar wrote:
Hi Tanel,
Good that it becomes a hidden parameter in 10g. The bug number that
was given to me was 4008013 but was not table to see the bug details.
Your search returned no hits!
The combination of key words and attributes you were searching for did
not retrieve any results.
This bug is probably under double secret probation by dean Wormer.
--
Mladen Gogala
Oracle DBA
Ext. 121
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- Caution on LOG_PARALLELISM
- From: Sriram Kumar
- Re: Caution on LOG_PARALLELISM
- From: Tanel Põder
- Re: Caution on LOG_PARALLELISM
- From: Sriram Kumar
Other related posts:
- » Caution on LOG_PARALLELISM
- » Re: Caution on LOG_PARALLELISM
- » Re: Caution on LOG_PARALLELISM
- » Re: Caution on LOG_PARALLELISM
- » Re: Caution on LOG_PARALLELISM
- » Re: Caution on LOG_PARALLELISM
Hi Tanel,
Good that it becomes a hidden parameter in 10g. The bug number that
was given to me was 4008013 but was not table to see the bug details.
Your search returned no hits!
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Caution on LOG_PARALLELISM
- From: Sriram Kumar
- Re: Caution on LOG_PARALLELISM
- From: Tanel Põder
- Re: Caution on LOG_PARALLELISM
- From: Sriram Kumar