Re: Caution on LOG_PARALLELISM
- From: Sriram Kumar <k.sriramkumar@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:54:56 +0200
Hi Tanel,
Good that it becomes a hidden parameter in 10g. The bug number that
was given to me was 4008013 but was not table to see the bug details.
Best Regards
Sriram Kumar
On 8/10/05, Tanel Põder <tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Lesson I learnt from this exercise is that always use log_parallelism
> > with caution and would also suggest folks not to try this directly in
> > a critcal environment.
>
> We'll starting from 10g, log_parallelism becomes a hidden parameter and also
> there is such a thing like dynamic log parallelism, that Oracle can change
> the number of redolog strands on the fly. So from 10g you really can't
> control it, unless instructed so by support...
>
> Do you have the bug number?
>
> Tanel.
>
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
