RE: CamelCase For Procedures Names

Really, I feel table names should be plural.   I believe Steve Feuerstein 
recommends this too. It is a Table of EMPLOYEES not a Table of EMPLOYEE.

From: Joel.Patterson@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Joel.Patterson@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 11:44 AM
To: michaeljmoore@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kennethnaim@xxxxxxxxx; Jeff Chirco; 
Oracle-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: CamelCase For Procedures Names

I certainly agree about the prefixes - and the suffices for that matter.   I 
just made an exception for tables - but optional.   Something not mentioned, 
but not optional IMHO is to make table names singular.   It is the EMPLOYEE 
table, not EMPLOYEES.



Joel Patterson
Database Administrator
904 727-2546
From: Michael Moore 
[mailto:michaeljmoore@xxxxxxxxx]<mailto:[mailto:michaeljmoore@xxxxxxxxx]>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 11:47 AM
To: Patterson, Joel
Cc: andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
kennethnaim@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:kennethnaim@xxxxxxxxx>; 
JChirco@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:JChirco@xxxxxxxxxx>; 
Oracle-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Oracle-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: CamelCase For Procedures Names

I think the advantages of having a standard prefix outweigh the disadvantages. 
One such advantage I found unexpectedly. We start all of out table names with 
T, like TVENDOR. The big advantage comes in verbal conversation. When, in a 
design meeting, somebody says 'tee-vendor' , it is immediately clear that they 
are talking about the database table, and not a person that sells things. Of 
course you could say, 'the vendor table', but when the names of tables are 
mentioned thousands of times over the course of a month, the savings in time 
and effort adds up. Other advantages may be specific to your shop. I.e do you 
use Perforce? Do you produce reports that contain a mishmash of dictionary 
object types. One suggestion I would make however is not to use a _ .  ie. not 
T_VENDOR, but TVENDOR. With only 30 characters, every character counts. 
Sometimes you will want to combine names, for example suppose you want at table 
that maps vendors to customers. You might want to call it Tcustomer_vendor_map. 
Then suppose you want to name an  index for this table; 
tcustomer_vendor_map_ix. In this particular example still did not push beyond 
the 30 character limit  but many table names will be more than 6 to 8 
characters to start with. This might seem like a trivial problem, but it can be 
very annoying when you are trying to follow the index naming standard and 
somebody has created a table name that's alerady 30 characters long. Use 
abbreviations where possible. Instead of Tbilling_revenue_stage, use 
tbil_rev_stg. Maybe the first time somebody looks at it, they won't know what 
it means, but some poor schmuck like me is going to have to type that table 
name a thousand times over the next 5 years, so keep it short.
IMHO.

Mike
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:00 AM, 
<Joel.Patterson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Joel.Patterson@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I like the example, it pretty much says it all (43 chars though).

What about suffixes or prefixes like R_for_procedures (or _R), or P_for 
packages, I did not catch Steve mentioning Packages and Package declarations in 
the paper?  (btw I don't believe tables need a prefix or suffix).

I do like what Steve says about avoiding 'get' with regards to a function.

Joel Patterson
Database Administrator
904 727-2546<tel:904%20727-2546>
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On 
Behalf Of Andy Klock
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 9:11 PM
To: kennethnaim@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:kennethnaim@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: JChirco@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:JChirco@xxxxxxxxxx>; oracle Freelists
Subject: Re: CamelCase For Procedures Names

The most important thing is consistency by a defined coding standard
that everyone must follow.  I don't even think it's because it makes
the code more readable (though it does) but more because it saves so
much time not having to think about what and how to call stuff.
Developers should spend more time on the actual logic than whether or
not to use CamelCaseWhichIsAnnoyingAsHellWithLongNames or
easy_to_read_names.

An old friend and colleague (who I know is a lurker here:) turned our
old team onto a document very much like this:

http://www.toadworld.com/Portals/0/stevenf/Naming%20Conventions%20and%20Coding%20Standards.pdf

Make amendments to fit your taste.  For me it made all the difference
in the world.

Andy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> On Behalf Of Jeff Chirco
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 5:39 PM
> To: oracle Freelists
> Subject: CamelCase For Procedures Names
>
> I am settling a debate about allowing CamelCase procedure names within a
> package.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


Other related posts: