RE: CWSPEEDNW/CPUSPEED vs. actual Cpu speed
- From: "Kenneth Naim" <kennethnaim@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'Carlos Sierra'" <carlos.sierra.usa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 09:08:02 -0400
Thanks, thought I had an issue here.
From: Carlos Sierra [mailto:carlos.sierra.usa@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 3:04 PM
To: kennethnaim@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Oracle-L Group
Subject: Re: CWSPEEDNW/CPUSPEED vs. actual Cpu speed
Ken,
There is no direct correlation. The values that I have seen from many
customers are in the range between 1,000 and 1,600.
Carlos
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Kenneth Naim <kennethnaim@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I have a system that when system stats are gathered (using either no
workload or with a workload) show a value of about 1260 for
cpuspeed/cpuspeednw. The server is IBM p7 with 3.5ghtz cpu's. I expected the
values returned by oracle to be close to 3500. Is my assumption incorrect?
Is there a direct correlation between actual clock speeds and the value
reported by the database? DB version is 11.2.0.3.
Thank you in advance,
Ken
_____
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5156 - Release Date: 07/26/12
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
Cheers -- Carlos Sierra
http://carlos-sierra.net/
_____
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5156 - Release Date: 07/26/12
_____
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5158 - Release Date: 07/27/12
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
