Re: CATPROC gets invalidated
- From: Tanel Põder <tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx>
- To: <gorbyx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:19:29 +0800
Do you mean that altering an object which is referenced by PL/SQL
package/procedure through a synonym won't invalidate that PL/SQL object on
certain conditions.
Tanel.
Good idea. Thanks.
However, DBMS_STANDARD was not maked as invalid last time and was not
modified since I reloaded catproc last time. Will try to see it
anyway.
I recall there is a new feature with invalidation of PL/SQL objects in
10g.... I can't recall what is that about.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CATPROC gets invalidated
- From: Alex Gorbachev
- References:
- CATPROC gets invalidated
- From: Alex Gorbachev
- Re: CATPROC gets invalidated
- From: Tanel Põder
- Re: CATPROC gets invalidated
- From: Alex Gorbachev
Other related posts:
- » CATPROC gets invalidated
- » Re: CATPROC gets invalidated
- » Re: CATPROC gets invalidated
- » Re: CATPROC gets invalidated
- » Re: CATPROC gets invalidated
- » Re: CATPROC gets invalidated
- » Re: CATPROC gets invalidated
- » RE: CATPROC gets invalidated
Tanel.
Good idea. Thanks. However, DBMS_STANDARD was not maked as invalid last time and was not modified since I reloaded catproc last time. Will try to see it anyway. I recall there is a new feature with invalidation of PL/SQL objects in 10g.... I can't recall what is that about.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Re: CATPROC gets invalidated
- From: Alex Gorbachev
- CATPROC gets invalidated
- From: Alex Gorbachev
- Re: CATPROC gets invalidated
- From: Tanel Põder
- Re: CATPROC gets invalidated
- From: Alex Gorbachev