Re: Backup opinions
- From: "jason arneil" <jason.arneil@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:30:53 +0100
Hi Noons,
I've been using Netbackup & the oracle agent for around 5 years with oracle
versions 9 .2, 10.1 & 10.2. I backup to tape & remote disk simultaneously. I
do not use FRA, but then maybe I'm just a dba1.0 ;-)
In particular doing a full clone to another server is just a couple of rman
commands. Yes, I use archivelogs as well straight to tape, and these get
applied when doing the cloning.
For me, it is just utilising rman with a remote store. You may have to watch
your rman retention policy with your netbackup retention policy. I have a
quite bonkers of never deleting a tape.
cheers,
jason.
--
http://jarneil.wordpress.com
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Nuno Souto <dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Folks, much appreciated if I can get some info:
>
> Anyone here using Netbackup agent to backup
> their dbs directly to tape - without using
> a FRA?
>
> If so, what's your opinion of ease of logging and
> recovery, flexibility in being able to transfer
> backups to others dbs for refreshes, etcetc.
>
> Also: are you using archived redo logs in full
> recovery?
>
> How does Netbackup then operate in a recovery
> situation?
>
> Only for 10g onwards users, please: I'm interested
> specifically in FRA vs Netbackup comments.
>
> --
> Cheers
> Nuno Souto
> in cold Sydney, Australia
> dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
Other related posts:
